This Article examines the eligibility of housewives, househusbands, and unpaid domestic workers to claim loss of earning capacity under Philippine tort law. Despite their contributions to the household economy, they remain outside the framework for compensatory damages. By surfacing this doctrinal gap, the Article argues that an interpretation that can accommodate the loss of housekeeping capacity under the existing head of actual damages is both possible and necessary. Through a survey of jurisprudence, the Article outlines how the Supreme Court has already adopted forward-looking approaches in awarding loss of earning capacity to certain non-earning individuals. It then turns to comparative law for models of loss of housekeeping capacity, drawing from jurisdictions that subsume unpaid domestic labor under compensable economic loss. Finally, it applies the capability approach to frame unpaid domestic work as a loss of real human functioning that warrants legal redress. In doing so, this Article invites a recalibration of how case law can be applied with greater fidelity to restitutio in integrum.